• Coedited with S. Thandi "Punjabi Identity in a Global Context" (OUP, 1999).
• "Capital, State and Nation in India: Reflections with reference to Punjab", International Journal of Punjab Studies, Vol. 6 No.1, Jan-June 1999, pp85-99.
• "Federal Financial Arrangements in India with Special Reference to Punjab", Austrian Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 9 No 3, 1991 pp261-278.
• "Hindu Bias in India"s "Secular" Constitution: probing flaws in the instruments of governance", Third World Quarterly Vol.26 No.6, pp.909-26.
Sinha, Ajit
Professor, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics
Mail: Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune 411004, India.
Email: sinha_a99@yahoo.com
• Marxian Economics, Sraffian Economics, History of Economic Theory.
• "A Critique of Part One of Capital Vol. 1: The Value Controversy revisited", Research in Political Economy Vol. 15, 1996, pp.195-222.
• "Understanding the Transformation Problem: Is the Standard Commodity a Solution? ", Review of Radical Political Economics, 32(2), 2000, pp. 265-281.
• "Labour Theory of Value", Reader"s Guide to Social Sciences, (ed.) Jonathan Michie, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, London, 2001. Also reprinted in Encyclopedia of Social Sciences (2002) by the same publisher.
Sinioutine, Mikhail
Department of Economic Sociology, St-Petersburg State University.
Mail: Ul Smolnogo 1/3, entrance 9,R202, St-Petersburg 193060, Russia.
• History of social and economic thought, Economic Sociology, Institutional Economics, Marxism.
• Institutional Approach in Economic Sociology, St-Petersburg: NIIC SPbSU, 2002 (in Russian).
• "The Mafia Institution: Private Property on Violence", Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. V, #1 - 2002, 125-150 (in Russian).
• Future for Society of Labor (co-author), St-Petersburg: SPbSU, forthcoming, (in Russian).
Stanfield, J. Ron
Colorado State University
Mail: 2106 Kirkwood Court, Fort Collins CO 80525-1920, USA.
Email: rstanfie@lamar.colostate.edu
• Transitioning economies, marxian & original institutional economics, globalization.
• Economics, Power, and Culture: Essays in the Development of Radical Institutionalism. London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin"s, 1995.
• The Economic Thought of Karl Polanyi: Lives and Livelihood. London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin"s, 1986.
• The Economic Surplus and Neo-Marxism. Lexington, MA.: D. C.Heath-Lexington Books, 1973.
Tanski, Janet M.
New Mexico State University
Mail: P.O. Box 30001/3CQ
• Capital concentration, Comparative Systems, Gender Economics, Women in Latin America, Marxist Political Economy.
• Tanski, Janet M. and Dan W. French (2001). "Capital Concentration and Market Power in Mexico"s Manufacturing Industry: Has Trade Liberalization Made a Difference?" Journal of Economic Issues, September 2001, pp. 675-711.
• Tanski, Janet M. (1994). "The Impact of Crisis, Stabilization and Structural Adjustment on Women in Lima, Peru," World Development, Vol. 22, No. 11, November, pp. 1627-1642.
• Tanski, Janet M. (1992). "The State and Social Appropriation: The Case of Nicaragua (1979-1989)", Research in Political Economy, Vol. 13, 1992, pp.199-243.
Titumir, Rashed Al Mahmud
Department of Development Studies, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mail: Department of Development Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka - 1000, Bangladesh.
Tel: (880 2) 9675192
Fax: (880 2) 8615583
Email: r_titumir@yahoo.com
• Political Economy, Marxism, Public Policy, Macroeconomics, Trade Policy (bilateral, regional and multilateral), Structural Adjustment, Poverty, Education, Health, Donors" Assistance Strategy, Quantitative and Participatory Techniques.
Trigg, Andrew
The Open University
Mail: Dr Andrew Trigg, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, U.K.
Tel: 01908 654421
Fax: 01908 654488
Email: A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk
• Multisectoral foundations and interfaces between Marxian, Post Keynesian and Sraffian economics; including the labour theory of value, theories of growth and reproduction, the principle of effective demand and money circuit theory.
• Trigg, A.B. (2002) "Surplus Value and the Kalecki Principle in Marx"s Reproduction Schema", History of Economics Review, Vol 35, pp. 104-114.
• Trigg, A.B. (2002) "Surplus Value and the Keynesian Multiplier", Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol 34, No.1, pp. 55-65.
• Trigg, A.B. (2002) "Marx"s Reproduction Schema and the Multisectoral Foundations of the Domar Growth Model", History of Economic Ideas, forthcoming.
资本论I第23章与效率工资理论
中国社会科学院经济研究所左大培：非新古典的经典经济学科学的真知灼见 摘录
朱绍文先生一再要求他的弟子们：要反复阅读马克思《资本论》的原著，以便真正领会和把握马克思的科学思想；他还多次强调：亚当•斯密有关生产劳动的学说，才真正指明了增加“国民财富”的道路，生产劳动是“国民财富”的真正最终源泉。对亚当•斯密和马克思的这种高度推崇与对新古典经济学的尖锐批评在他那里形成了极为鲜明的对照。这就表明，朱绍文先生推崇的是亚当•斯密和马克思的那些不同于新古典经济学的思想学说，是“非新古典的古典经济学”。
按照当代的新自由主义经济学的说法，新古典经济学继承了亚当•斯密反对国家干预的经济自由主义传统。但是正象朱绍文先生反复强调的那样，斯密的经济自由主义有着与新古典经济学的自由主义截然不同的时代特征和阶级含义。斯密的重要不仅仅在于他在经济政策上是经济自由主义的首领，更在于他从理论上建立了古典经济学的思想体系，真正指出了现代资本主义市场经济形成的道路。而他建立的古典经济学的思想体系有着许多不同于新古典经济学的本质特征。斯密关于生产劳动的学说就是这些本质特征的一个最清楚的表现。
在当代的许多经济理论家看来，卡尔•马克思与亚当•斯密等人一样也属于古典经济学家之列。马克思的经济理论之所以被列入古典经济学，是因为它保持并发展了亚当•斯密所代表的一些重要的理论传统，这些理论传统成了古典经济学的主要特征。古典经济学的这些特征和传统之一就是它的阶级分析：它强调社会上各个阶级的经济作用和它们之间的利益冲突（Robinson and Eatwell, 1974，45页及第一篇第二章）。朱绍文先生推崇亚当•斯密和马克思而批判新古典经济学，实质上是推崇古典经济学中的那些不同于新古典经济学的理论学说，是强调和阐发那些非新古典的古典经济学科学命题。
在古典经济学的这些不同于新古典经济学的科学命题中，最重要的命题之一就是各阶级的经济作用与利益冲突在经济生活中的决定意义。古典经济学所划分的不同阶级首先是不同的生产要素的所有者：资本家阶级是资本的所有者，地主阶级是土地的所有者，工人阶级则是既无资本又无土地的单纯的劳动力所有者。古典经济学家们还依据在社会再生产过程中与资本的关系来对社会阶级进一步加以细分。亚当•斯密就是依据是否再生产出资本而区分了生产劳动和非生产劳动。对经济生活的阶级分析，是古典经济学不同于新古典经济学的一大特征。马克思将这种阶级分析进一步延伸到资本主义企业内部的生产领域，从而形成了马克思主义经济学的企业理论。它更是与新古典经济学完全对立的。本文就是在这个意义上使用“非新古典的古典经济学”这一概念的。